This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
EBIT Related Topics 
Andrew Stolz
AUGUST 10, 2020
Definition of EBIT Margin. EBIT margin stands for Earning Before Interest and Tax margin. The higher the EBIT the better it is for the firm. What is the Formula for the EBIT Margin? EBIT margin is calculated by dividing EBIT by revenue. EBIT margin = EBIT / Revenue . EBIT Margin in Practice.
52 
Financial Times M&A
MARCH 19, 2025
The number can be tailored to suit the occasion
107
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Andrew Stolz
AUGUST 10, 2020
Definition of EBIT Return on Assets. EBIT return on asset measures the firm’s earnings before interest and tax with respect to the firm’s total asset. The reason EBIT is used and not net income is because EBIT focuses only on operating cash flows. . What is the Formula for EBIT Return on Assets? EBIT = Revenue ?
52 
Equilest
DECEMBER 3, 2022
EBIT and EBITDA are two measurements of business profitability. This article will discuss two accounting terms used to build the FCFF - EBIT and EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization). Both EBIT and EBITDA are indicators of the firm's profitability. . What is EBIT? Let's discuss. . .
40 
Mckinsey and Company
FEBRUARY 6, 2023
Road freight carriers and brokers could improve EBIT by 15 to 30 percent by leveraging data for decision making—here’s how.
98 98 
Midstreet Blog
DECEMBER 2, 2022
If you’re interested in selling your business, you may be doing some research on how businesses are valued. There are lots of misleading theories out there about how to best value a business, including using a multiple of revenue (not good) or a multiple of net profit (even worse).
52 
Quantive
JUNE 17, 2023
EBIT and EBITDA are two of the many metrics used to help […]
52 
Andrew Stolz
AUGUST 10, 2020
NOPAT can be calculated through the following formula: EBIT x (1 – tax rate). EBIT is the earnings before interest and tax. To find the ROIC, you divide NOPAT by Invested Capital. NOPAT ÷ Invested Capital. The NOPAT is the net operating profit after tax. ROIC in Practice. Tony wanted to open up a shop that sells shoes.
52 
Benzinga
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
Also Read: Disney Scrutinizing its TV Network Portfolio ValueAct notes that Disney's theme parks and consumer products businesses and their $10 billion in EBIT are alone. ValueAct Capital began buying Disney in 2023 summer during the Hollywood strikes, and it is now one of the largest shareholders, CNBC cites Activist Spotlight.
52 52 
Benzinga
FEBRUARY 14, 2024
Adjusted EBIT increased 18% Y/Y to $392 million, with margin expanding to 17% from 15% prior year quarter. Sales by segments : Composites $514 million (-13% Y/Y), Insulation $931 million (-3% Y/Y), and Roofing $928 million (+16% Y/Y). Adjusted EPS was $3.21, up from $2.49 a year ago, above the consensus of $2.86. Adjusted EBITDA rose by.
52 
Benzinga
JUNE 15, 2022
However, High Tide needs greater operating leverage , “given the current negative EBIT and FCF pace,” Zuanic said. EV/Sales on our CY23 estimates).
52 
Valutico
NOVEMBER 28, 2022
billion with EBIT margin increasing to 16.6% The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of CHF 47 to 83 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. ABB’s order intake rose 4% to CHF 7.9 billion, the company said in its third-quarter press release. Sales rose 5% to CHF 7.1
Valutico
NOVEMBER 28, 2022
billion with EBIT margin increasing to 16.6% The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of CHF 47 to 83 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. ABB’s order intake rose 4% to CHF 7.9 billion, the company said in its third-quarter press release. Sales rose 5% to CHF 7.1
Valutico
AUGUST 16, 2022
The trading comparables approach confirms this view with the median EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E multiples applied to the 2023 forecasts producing a valuation range of USD 600 million to USD 1.1 While the current market capitalisation was USD 1.42 billion.
59 
Valutico
SEPTEMBER 19, 2022
A useful tip is to check for consistency between the forecast margins and historical margins—EBITDA margin, EBIT margin, and Net Income margin. Hockey stick-like growth in your DCF projections may indicate these projections are not realistic.
Equilest
MARCH 17, 2022
In practice, professionals rely on several results, assessed at different levels of the income statement: - the gross operating surplus (EBIT or EBITDA) - net operating surplus (ENE or EBIT) - the Current Result Before Tax (RCAI) - Net Income (NR) - Self-Financing Capacity (CAF) or operating cash flow. EBITDA and EBIT).
Valutico
OCTOBER 17, 2022
In the fo rmer, we compared Porsche with peers such as BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Ferrari and Ford using thethe EV/EBITDA and the EV/EBIT multiples. We have performed a Trading Comparables analysis and a discounted cash flow using the Flow to Equity Approach. Our result suggests a valuation range of €74 billion to € 96 billion.
Andrew Stolz
JANUARY 13, 2022
EBIT margin is likely to expand significantly through better cost control. We see an EBIT margin around 15% as a maximum for this Ralph Lauren. After the revenue rebound in 22E, we assume revenue growth to normalize. Going forward, we see the revenue growth potential between 3-4%. So, we already have an optimistic bias.
52 
Andrew Stolz
JANUARY 16, 2022
EBIT margin expansion in 22E probably only short-lived. Going forward, we see the EBIT margin to range between 7-8%. After the revenue rebound in 22E, we assume revenue growth to normalize. Going forward, we see poor revenue growth potential between 2-3%. Long-term share price performance potential. Free cash flow – Kohl’s.
52 
Valutico
DECEMBER 15, 2022
An example of an enterprise multiple: EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and practically all non-financial multiples (e.g. Note that, because the impact of debt (in the form of interest), falls below EBIT on the P&L, typically any metric below that would be an equity metric and any metric above that would be an enterprise metric.
Valutico
DECEMBER 15, 2022
An example of an enterprise multiple: EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and practically all non-financial multiples (e.g. Note that, because the impact of debt (in the form of interest), falls below EBIT on the P&L, typically any metric below that would be an equity metric and any metric above that would be an enterprise metric.
Andrew Stolz
JANUARY 12, 2022
If it can maintain a 6-7% EBIT margin it changes the market’s assessment of the company. If it can maintain a 6-7% EBIT margin, then this could be a catalyst for share price performance. Mainly from fierce price competition, higher labor costs and the recent chip shortage. Reducing reliance on global supply chains. P&L – Hyundai.
52 
Valutico
JULY 7, 2023
billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E and P/B. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of CAD 14.7 billion using a WACC of 8.8%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of CAD 6.4 billion to CAD 28.1 and Peninsula Energy Limited. billion to CAD 19 billion.
Valutico
JUNE 26, 2023
billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 27.1 billion using a WACC of 11.7%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 27.1 billion to USD 35.4 Earthstone Energy, Inc. and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
Valutico
FEBRUARY 8, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $257 billion to $296 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Flow-to-Equity analysis produced a value of $308 billion using a Cost of Equity of 9.2%.
Valutico
DECEMBER 6, 2022
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $81 to $158 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $99.5 billion using a WACC of 9.7%. For our Trading Comparables we selected similar peers such as SAP and Microsoft.
Valutico
DECEMBER 6, 2022
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $81 to $158 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $99.5 billion using a WACC of 9.7%. For our Trading Comparables we selected similar peers such as SAP and Microsoft.
Reynolds Holding
JUNE 13, 2022
To double-check for this possibility, we test for the difference in the change in the ratio of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to total assets from pre- to post-quota between firms regulated and not regulated by the quota law, covering the period 2001-2013.
45 
Valutico
JUNE 9, 2023
billion to USD 108 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 212 billion using a WACC of 6.8%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 57.2 Scandinavian Tobacco Group A/S and Vector Group Ltd.
Valutico
MAY 24, 2023
billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 21.8 billion using a WACC of 10%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 15.5 billion to USD 32.3 Energy Transfer L.P. and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
Valutico
APRIL 24, 2023
billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 75.3 billion using a WACC of 6.3%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 45.7 billion to USD 74.5 The Simply Good Foods Company and Campbell Soup Company.
Valutico
APRIL 24, 2023
billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 75.3 billion using a WACC of 6.3%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 45.7 billion to USD 74.5 The Simply Good Foods Company and Campbell Soup Company.
Valutico
MARCH 9, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of €305 billion to €492 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of €330 billion using a WACC of 9.3%.
Valutico
FEBRUARY 21, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $1,517 billion to $2,344 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $1,373 billion using a WACC of 9.9%.
Valutico
JANUARY 9, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $83 billion to $118 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $68.6 billion using a WACC of 8%. . For our Trading Comparables we selected similar peers such as McDonald’s, Yum!
Valutico
NOVEMBER 21, 2022
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $202 billion to $231 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $230 billion, with a WACC of 8.8%. .
Valutico
JANUARY 9, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $83 billion to $118 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $68.6 billion using a WACC of 8%. . For our Trading Comparables we selected similar peers such as McDonald’s, Yum!
Valutico
NOVEMBER 21, 2022
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $202 billion to $231 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of $230 billion, with a WACC of 8.8%. .
Valutico
JULY 25, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 503 billion to USD 812 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a valuation range of USD 370 billion to USD 493 billion using a WACC of 12.9%. Microsoft Corporation.
Valutico
JUNE 15, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 60 billion to USD 277 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 267 billion using a WACC of 13.6%. and Cisco Systems, Inc.
Valutico
MAY 18, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 106 billion to USD 235 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced a value of USD 222 billion using a WACC of 6.4%. and Alphabet Inc.
Valutico
MARCH 1, 2023
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of GBP 98 (USD 199) billion to GBP 137 (USD 166) billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E and P/B. For our Trading Comparables we selected similar peers such as Total Energies, Shell, Chevron and Saudi Arabien Oil Company.
Valutico
JANUARY 5, 2023
billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of HKD 1,752 (USD 221.5) For our Trading Comparables we selected similar peers such as Alibaba, NetEase and Meta Platforms. billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion.
Valutico
NOVEMBER 7, 2022
We came up with this valuation range by using the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E of peers such as Nike and Puma. . The Trading Comparable analysis shows a completely different picture for the valuation of Adidas, as it suggests a value between €15.6 billion and €26.2 billion to €44.9
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
We have resent the email to
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscriptions?
Let's personalize your content