This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Not surprisingly, the company listings are across the world, and I look at the breakdown of companies, by number and market cap, by geography: As you can see, the market cap of US companies at the start of 2025 accounted for roughly 49% of the market cap of global stocks, up from 44% at the start of 2024 and 42% at the start of 2023.
3] The Grant On January 21, 2018, Tesla’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) [4] unanimously approved the Grant, which would vest based on Tesla’s achievement of certain marketcapitalization goals, as well as operational milestones related to revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets. The process arrived at an unfair price.” [3]
The current price of $133 represents a marketcapitalization of $145 billion. At the current level Salesforce has a P/E ratio of 100x and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 47x for 2022. This was mainly driven by operating expenses growth exceeding sales growth and thus putting strain on EBITDA margin. Link to detailed valuation.
The current price of $133 represents a marketcapitalization of $145 billion. At the current level Salesforce has a P/E ratio of 100x and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 47x for 2022. This was mainly driven by operating expenses growth exceeding sales growth and thus putting strain on EBITDA margin. Link to detailed valuation.
On the alternative energy front, as money has flowed into these companies, there has been a surge in enterprise value (equity and net debt) and marketcapitalization (equity value); I report both because impact investing can also take the form of green bonds, or debt, at these companies. in the 1998-2010 time period to 5.95
Inflation and Value When in doubt about how any action or information plays out in value, I find it useful to go back to value basics, and trace out the effects of that action/information on value drivers. The former is short hand for the small cap premium and the latter is the proxy for the value factor in returns.
billion, driven by lower interest expense and lower non-cash impairment losses, offset by lower Adjusted EBITDA, an accrual related to the securities class action lawsuit, and higher supply chain and commodity costs. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 5.8% billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E.
billion, driven by lower interest expense and lower non-cash impairment losses, offset by lower Adjusted EBITDA, an accrual related to the securities class action lawsuit, and higher supply chain and commodity costs. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 5.8% billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E.
The company also was able to increase its EBITDA by 6.5% with an overall EBITDA margin of 35.2%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of €98 to €222 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. billion which is an increase of 5.7% compared to last year’s Q3.
The company also was able to increase its EBITDA by 6.5% with an overall EBITDA margin of 35.2%. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of €98 to €222 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. billion which is an increase of 5.7% compared to last year’s Q3.
The company is one of the world’s largest companies with a marketcapitalization of $1.34 Chat GPT Threatening Traditional Search Engines AI models like Chat GPT, provided by OpenAI, have the potential to disrupt traditional search engines as these models are able to provide more accurate and efficient information.
It sustains its FY 2023 production and capital spending outlook. Share Price Performance The company has a marketcapitalization of more than $32 billion, however, its share price is still down roughly 30% from highs set last year. billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E.
The company has a leading position in the Southeast Asian market with their e-commerce platform Shoppee and their gaming offers by Garena. Sea currently has a marketcapitalization of $29.8 billion by applying the observed multiple EV/EBITDA for 2024 and EV/Sales. In comparison to Sea’s marketcapitalization of $29.8
2022 saw a robust cash and capital structure with a staggering USD 967 million adjusted EBITDA in Q4, up by 14% from the previous year. billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Oneok marketcapitalization of USD 25.9 billion using a WACC of 10%.
The numbers that I computed opened my eyes to how much perspective on the high, low, and typical values, i.e., the distribution of margins, helped in valuing the company, and how little information there was available, at least at that time, on this dimension. EBIT & EBITDA multiple s 5.
With a marketcapitalization of €395 billion, it is the most valuable company in Europe. The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of €305 billion to €492 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. Let us know in the comments.
In the CCA method, valuation multiples such as P/E ratio, EV/Revenue ratio, and EV/EBITDA ratio, provide benchmarks for estimating value by comparing financial metrics to publicly traded companies. Public companies have readily available financial data, trade on public exchanges, and are subject to market forces.
In the CCA method, valuation multiples such as P/E ratio, EV/Revenue ratio, and EV/EBITDA ratio, provide benchmarks for estimating value by comparing financial metrics to publicly traded companies. Public companies have readily available financial data, trade on public exchanges, and are subject to market forces.
Emphasizing the company’s robust market performance, Nvidia’s marketcapitalization has hit the USD 1 trillion milestone, joining the elite league of tech behemoths such as Apple and Amazon. Reflecting strong Q1 2023 performance and favorable market trends, NVIDIA’s current share price stands at USD 430.39.
Currently the company is trading at CHF 30 per share with a marketcapitalization of CHF 56.1 The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of CHF 47 to 83 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to ABB’s marketcapitalization of CHF 56.1
Currently the company is trading at CHF 30 per share with a marketcapitalization of CHF 56.1 The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of CHF 47 to 83 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to ABB’s marketcapitalization of CHF 56.1
We used the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E of a group of similar listed peers for our Trading Comparables analysis, arriving at a valuation range of $193 billion to $237 billion. Alibaba’s current marketcapitalization of $167 billion suggests that the company is undervalued. Disclaimer.
When evaluating the financial health of a company, it is often important to compare it to similar companies in the same industry or market. This allows investors and analysts to better understand the performance of the company and make informed investment decisions. How do you choose comparable companies? What are Comparable Companies?
billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E and P/B. In comparison to Cameco marketcapitalization of CAD 18.3 In comparison to Cameco marketcapitalization of CAD 18.3 The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of CAD 6.4 billion to CAD 28.1
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $257 billion to $296 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Visa’s marketcapitalization of $471 billion we suggest that the company is significantly overvalued. Let us know in the comments.
Market-based approaches gauge a company’s value by analyzing comparable market transactions and valuations. While many people are familiar with marketcapitalization as a method for understanding the general worth of publicly traded companies based on the current market sentiment (itself based on company performance, etc.),
billion to USD 108 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to PMI marketcapitalization of USD 140 billion we suggest that the company is fairly valued. In comparison to PMI marketcapitalization of USD 140 billion we suggest that the company is fairly valued.
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $83 billion to $118 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Starbucks’ marketcapitalization of $120 billion we suggest that the company is slightly overvalued. . billion to $118 billion. Disclaimer.
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $202 billion to $231 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Home Depot’s marketcapitalization of $319 billion we suggest that the company is overvalued. Link to valuation. Disclaimer.
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $83 billion to $118 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Starbucks’ marketcapitalization of $120 billion we suggest that the company is slightly overvalued. . billion to $118 billion. Disclaimer.
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of $202 billion to $231 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Home Depot’s marketcapitalization of $319 billion we suggest that the company is overvalued. Link to valuation. Disclaimer.
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of USD 106 billion to USD 235 billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to IBM marketcapitalization of USD 114 billion we suggest that the company is undervalued. and Alphabet Inc.
The Trading Comparables analysis resulted in a valuation range of GBP 98 (USD 199) billion to GBP 137 (USD 166) billion by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E and P/B. In comparison to BP’s marketcapitalization of GBP 101 (USD 122) billion we suggest that the company is slightly undervalued.
billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Tencent’s marketcapitalization of HKD 3,070 (USD 386.6) In comparison to Tencent’s marketcapitalization of HKD 3,070 (USD 386.6) billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion. Disclaimer.
We came up with this valuation range by using the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E of peers such as Nike and Puma. . This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. By combining these two approaches we arrive at a fairly wide valuation range of €15.6 billion to €44.9
Our Trading Comparables analysis produced a valuation range of €178 billion to €222 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E and P/B. At TotalEnergies’ current marketcapitalization of €148 billion, our analysis suggests that the company is undervalued. Link to detailed valuation.
billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Tencent’s marketcapitalization of HKD 3,070 (USD 386.6) In comparison to Tencent’s marketcapitalization of HKD 3,070 (USD 386.6) billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion. Disclaimer.
billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E. In comparison to Tencent’s marketcapitalization of HKD 3,070 (USD 386.6) In comparison to Tencent’s marketcapitalization of HKD 3,070 (USD 386.6) billion to HKD 3,905 (USD 501) billion. Disclaimer.
Our Trading Comparables analysis produced a valuation range of €178 billion to €222 billion, by applying the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E and P/B. At TotalEnergies’ current marketcapitalization of €148 billion, our analysis suggests that the company is undervalued. Link to detailed valuation.
We came up with this valuation range by using the observed trading multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and P/E of peers such as Nike and Puma. . This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. By combining these two approaches we arrive at a fairly wide valuation range of €15.6 billion to €44.9
Get started now for free and unlock the power of Equitest to make informed decisions about your business's financial future. Equitest is a comprehensive business valuation software that simplifies the valuation process, providing users with the tools and calculations needed to make informed decisions about their business's financial future.
billion to USD 150 billion, by utilizing observed metrics such as EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, and P/E ratios. For a robust comparative landscape, we enlisted similar market players like Alphabet Inc.(Youtube), Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Youtube), Apple Inc.
MarketCapitalizationMarketcapitalization, or market cap, is calculated by multiplying the holding company's stock price by the total number of outstanding shares. Key financial metrics, such as price-to-earnings ratio and enterprise value-to-EBITDA, are used to assess the relative valuation.
Additionally, board positions come with fiduciary responsibilities to all shareholders, and access to inside information may limit the ability of activists to trade the stock of targets. Hedge fund activists are nonetheless still eager to obtain board representation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 8,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content